It goes over the pros of a federally-backed digital currency. | Photo Illustration by Budrul Chukrut/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images
A digital dollar backed by the US government might lead to faster money transfers, and be more accessible than the current banking system, according to a new paper from the Federal Reserve (via CNBC).
The paper is meant to act as āthe first step in a discussion,ā and doesnāt advocate for actually creating a ācentral bank digital currencyā (or CBDC). Still, the creation of a digital dollar would be a massive shift in how big a role the government would play in our finances. Potential downsides could include making commercial banks less attractive to consumers, and affect the Fedās ability to influence the financial system. The Fed is now inviting comments, including on anything the paper may have missed.
The paper, a step toward the existence of a digital dollar, comes at a time when around 90 other countries are considering their own digital currencies, according to Reuters. The European Central Bank is investigating the creation of a digital Euro, and China has been testing a digital yuan, which itās been working on since 2014. Meanwhile in the cryptocurrency world, stablecoins, some of which tie their value to the US dollar, have been rising in prominence.
The government is also looking to keep supporting āthe dominant international role of the U.S. dollar,ā as the paper puts it. Doing its research in public could help the government make it easier for other companies to design systems compatible with the USās, as Bloomberg points out.
A digital currency from the central bank could combine some of the benefits of federally-backed cash and privately-controlled digital money, such as:
Fast and easy transfers between people and businesses (even across borders)
More accessibility for people without bank accounts, who may have difficulties opening accounts at private financial institutions
More safety and consumer confidence ā banks can fail or run into liquidity issues, which is less likely with the US government
Thereās also the potential downsides: the government would have to navigate the marketās reaction to the US taking over a role traditionally served by commercial banks. It would also require citizens to trust the government directly with all their financial info, though the paper does vaguely say this concern could be mitigated by allowing āintermediariesā to address privacy concerns āby leveraging existing tools.ā
A digital currency doesnāt have to be blockchain-based. The Fed, in its paper, makes clear that no specific design or technology has been proposed yet, saying it āwill continue to explore a wide range of design options.ā
If the central bank were to create a digital currency, it would have to be āprivacy-protected, intermediated, widely transferable, and identity-verified,ā according to the paper. The reserve is currently experimenting with and exploring centralized, blockchain, and distributed methods of making a currency.
If youāre interested in the future of money, the paper is well worth a read. And if youāve got expertise or strong opinions about it, youāll have plenty of room to express them while going through the 22-point questionnaire.